Two of the highest priorities for the Montgomery County
Council are affordable housing and economic development. At least that’s what
we say. What we do is a different matter altogether.
Today the Montgomery County Council tabled Bill 39-11 which
would have fostered the creation of affordable housing through impact tax
incentives. The excuse? It hasn’t been fully vetted.
I introduced Bill 39-11 a year and a half ago with three
cosponsors. After a public hearing, significant research and two comprehensive
work sessions, the Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee endorsed
the bill. That can hardly be called a rush to judgment.
We need more affordable housing not just for downsizing
seniors, single heads of household and young starter families to have a decent
place to live, but also to support a workforce for a robust economy. The future
of our economic development hinges on our ability to retain and attract
moderate wage earners and the younger, skilled labor force.
In November 2011, Dr. Stephen Fuller, Director of the Center
for Regional Analysis at the George Mason University School of Public Policy
told us the top three challenges facing Montgomery County were:
- Having a sufficient supply and quality of labor to support future job growth;
- Having sufficient housing resources—in number, variety of types, and range of costs—both for renters and owners to house an increasing share of the county’s workforce thereby reducing the economy’s dependence on commuters to fill the county’s jobs; and
- Being competitive with other area jurisdictions in terms of location and operating costs and business friendly reputation.
No comments:
Post a Comment