The County Executive has sent us his proposed $14.1 million in operating budget reductions for the current fiscal year. These cuts would be needed to offset the amount of estimated revenue that would not be generated if the Emergency Medical Services Transport fee (ambulance fee) is rejected by voters through the Nov. 2 referendum. We included the estimated revenue from the fee in the budget we adopted in May.
Given our already tight budget, any further cuts will echo across the County. Our obligation is to maintain a balanced budget. If residents vote against the ambulance fee, they will be voting for $14 million in cuts to services. We will await the results of the referendum and take action on the proposed cuts before December if the fee is defeated.
The question will appear on the ballot as follows:
“Shall the Act to require the collection of an emergency medical services transport (ambulance) fee from: (1) County residents to the extent of the resident’s insurance coverage; and (2) non-County residents subject to a hardship waiver become law?”
A voter in favor of establishing the ambulance fee should for “for”; a voter opposed to establishing an ambulance fee should vote “against.”
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
$14 Million in Proposed Cuts if Ambulance Fee is Rejected
Posted by
Councilmember Nancy Floreen
Labels:
ambulance fees,
budget
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Dear Councilwoman Floreen,
Are there parameters established for what constitutes a "hardship"?
Is it a threshold or sliding scale?
Even small fees can wreck some budgets.
The main goal, charging non-residents' insurance, only makes sense. They charge OURS if we need an ambulance in THEIR counties. We can't afford to be unilaterally generous.
Post a Comment